Sheikh Al-Fawzan testifies to his own ignorance

Sheikh Al-Fawzan testifies to his own ignorance

Author: Abu Imad Abdullah bin Abdullah At-Tuneesi.

It is not my habit to expose those “sheikhs” whom knowledge is attributed to, and how often do I advise myself and my brothers to avoid talking about them from the same angle as the statement of the prophet peace be upon him:

“Let him be! So that people do not say that Muhammad kills his own companions”

and I do see that it was enough to explain and narrate the correct Manhaj to their followers and Mureedis so that they may know and realize the worthlessness of those people and their level of deviation from the right path, with so much anticipation in Allah to guide their deviants and return them to correctness, through the knowledge Allah has given them (our brothers).
However, we do not see them in this gloomy circumstance except as drowning in supporting the enemies of Allah and allying with them and decorating their falsehood in challenge against the people of Tawheed and Jihad and even ruled on them as misguided and even as disbelievers and they ascribed them to the Khawaarij sect that kills the people of Islam and leave alone the people of idols in their usual manner of helping – not leaving – the people of man made law and incitement to kill the people of Tawheed, and whenever we dream and anticipate about their guidance, they increase in ignorance and tyranny and indulging in obscurantism and misinformation, in an era when the Ummah is being invaded and its religion being targeted even before its resources at the hands of the Crusaders and their tails from the hypocrites whom these “sheikhs” legalize their Taaghuti rule.
Sheikh Saleh Al- Fawzan is one of these icons whom the Tawaagheet use to polish their image and justify their combination between islamic shareeah provisions and the provisions of manmade law, and their resort to the tawaagheet of the East and West with an ugly open support for Christians in killing the people of Islam within a stone’s throw from the Two Holy Mosques.

The man (Fawzaan) is (theoretically) upon a correct belief in matters of Eeman and Kufr and he has a number of good refutations – theoretical – against the doctrine of the Murjiah, and he affirms in more than one place that arbitrating to man made laws that violate the Shariah is Kufr in Allah and apostacy from his religion and he overlooks the belief of such people and he condemns those who limit Kufr to belief from amongst the Murjiah Jahamiyyah who litter the Muslim countries today, however, in contrast, practically he displays Irja’ in the ugliest forms, and he does not make Takfeer rather allies with those who rule and arbitrate to Kufr laws which the whole of the Salaf (predecessors) and reputable Khalaf (successors) have agreed that arbitrating to it is an open Kufr, and he (fawzaan) condemns in the greatest form whoever makes Takfeer of them and takes them as enemies!

How does he justify for himself this apparent contradiction?!
The answer to the question is from the conversation between him and some of his followers, where they said:

Q:
I say O Sheikh may Allah do good to you … Some people do understand from your book ‘Kitaabu Tawheed’ which is one of your works on the issue of Haakimiyyah, and ruling by other than what Allah has revealed, that you make specific takfeer of the ruler who does not rule by what Allah has revealed and they apply this particular speech on the Gulf rulers!

Sheikh Al-Fawzan:
“Heh heh … people of desire!! People of desire!! The speech is clear .. there is no confusion in it… the speech is clear! and the detail is mentioned in it!
I say again: the one who displaces the Shareeah and replaces it with man made law; this is an evidence that he has the opinion that the man made law is better than the Shareeah, and whoever has this view is a Kaafir!! … there is no doubt in it! … but they take with their understanding that which favours them! and they leave the rest of the statements! if not, had they read the statements from the beginning, it would have been clear out!! “.

Q:
And the words of Sheikh Mohammed Bin Ibrahim the same?!

Sheikh Al-Fawzan:
“It is same! Yes! It is: whoever displaces the Shareeah law and makes in its place man made law, it is an evidence that he believes that the man made law is better than the Shareeah law! And whoever feels that a man made law is better than the Shareeah is a Kaafir” …

Q:
What of the Gulf rulers, Sheikh?!

Sheikh Al-Fawzan:
“We are not capable of this … we don’t know anything about them and we do not know anything about their situation! The statement is a general statement, as for specific individuals, we need to make research …”.

Q:
There is a difference O our sheikh between specifying individuals and ruling on general !

Sheikh Al-Fawzan – also affirming: –
“… Yes!”.

Q:
but you know the general ruling – may Allah protect you-?!

Sheikh Al-Fawzan:
“The General rule! … There is no doubt in it! Did we say: Gulf rulers?!”.

Q:
No! you did not mention that … this is from the desire …

Sheikh Al-Fawzan:
“Hui! … Desires… When they make takfeer of the rulers of the Gulf, what will they sort out??!! … Is this reform?! Making takfeer of Gulf rulers … Is this part of reformation?! This is not reform but fitnah (sedition) !!
“end”.
[The above discussion is
found on the tape “Questions
and Answers on al-
Haakimiyyah”, and can be heard
at MNJ050014@
SalafiPublications.Com]
[an excerpt is also found on page 5 of
MNJ050019 of Salafi publications ]

If the Sheikh does not know the conditions of the rulers of the peninsula and what they rule with of systems and laws!! How does he now endorse what he is unaware of its situation and why does he give such an absolute alliance?

And how come he is hostile to those who make takfeer of it with substantiated evidences and unequivocal arguments?

But how come he issues fatwa and presents himself for fatwa while he is lagging in one of its required pillars, and that is the knowledge of the reality?
And how come he allows himself to be ignorant of the open Kufr going on at the topmost level of the Ummah?

And how come he declares that making takfeer of them is absolute fitnah (sedition) and corruption while he has affirmed himself that he does not know anything about their situation?
Is the implication of this not that he attaches fitnah and corruption to the very provisions of the Shareeah that he himself recognized and which declares kufr on those who replace the Shareeah with man made laws and arbitrate to it?

And the most important question is:

Is it true that the Sheikh is truly ignorant of the conditions of the rulers of the Peninsula – with the open ended statement that tends to include the rulers of Kuwait who are secularists and the rulers of Yemen who are Baathists – and others?
Is the Sheikh truly unaware of the presence of riba- based banks (interest banks) whose buildings overshadow that of the Sacred House of Allah in a bold declaration of war against Allah and His Messenger? Or is he blind and does not see it?
Is he unaware that the land of the peninsula has turned into military bases from which the war planes of the people of the Cross lift to hit our brothers in the east and the west? Or is he deaf and does not hear?
The issue is impossible with the people of intellect.
It is rather a fitnah with which Allah afflicts whomever he wishes among his slaves who are allying with the oppressors and approach the door of rulers.

It’s time for the Mureedis (blind followers ) to wake up and cling to the infallible texts of the revelation which does not get afflicted with falsehood and does not contradict itself as those “sheikhs” contradict themselves.{Had it been from other than Allah they would have found therein much discrepancies} [Suuratu Nisaai aayah 82].

And the good end is for the pious.

Author: Abu Imad Abdullah bin Abdullah At-Tuneesi.
source:
http://tawhed.ws/r?i=dz3maopn

Advertisements

About trulysalafiyyah

We wish to make all our Yoruba people Salafi Muslims
This entry was posted in Aqeedah, Bid'ah, General, Jarhu wa Ta'adeel, Manhaj Salafiyyah, on books and authors, on current affairs. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s